Jessica Duncan - Theory Review - Brain-Compatible Learning
Brain and Mind
Brain-Compatible Learning
Jessica Duncan
Ball State University
EDAC 635
Dr. Bo Chang
Jessica Duncan
|
Commented On
|
Introduction to the Brain and
Central Nervous System
When
learning about the brain and mind, I cannot help but picture Grand Central
Station. The activity that takes place such as the people coming and
going and the trains arriving and leaving – it is a complex system that all
works together in a synchronous pattern. The central nervous system is a huge hub full
of different parts all dissecting into different directions for multiple
purposes. According to our textbook, the central nervous system consists
of the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves all of which work together
collectively to stimulate learning and processing (MacKeracher, 2004, pg.
93). The nervous system is bringing in information from the environment
and then taking that information to break it down for processing (MacKeracher,
2004).
The
brain has three levels consisting of the reticular activating system, limbic
system, and neo-cortex. Each of these levels plays an integral part in processing
a complex amount of information. The reticular activating system is responsible
for translating information coming into and out of the brain. (MacKeracher,
2004, pg. 95)
MacKeracher (2004) states that the “limbic
system controls the individual’s basic value system, enhances or suppresses the
short-term memory, and has a marked effect on what we store in long-term memory.”
(MacKeracher, 2004, pg. 96 ) According to Major Structures and Functions
of the Brain, the neocortex is often referred to as the cerebral cortex. This is one of the largest parts of the brain
and plays a large role in intellect. The cerebral cortex is divided into two hemispheres
– left and right. (Ackerman, 1992). Each hemisphere is responsible for
mental functions that make a person's unique characteristics for learning. In A Dictionary of Nursing, the
cerebral cortex ‘is directly responsible for
consciousness, with essential roles in perception, memory, thought, mental
ability, and intellect, and it is responsible for initiating voluntary
activity.’ (Martin, 2017)
Cognition
While
the brain serves as the physical structure and allows for information to be
transmitted, the mind is where the action takes place in which we have
cognition. Cognition encompasses information which is perceived,
received, remembered, thought process, problem solving, and decision making
(MacKeracher, 2004). “Consider the fact that every brain, due to its different dendrite
connections, experiences, and memories, is as different as each individual’s
fingerprints.” (Erlaure, 2003, pg. 11). Learners are unique individuals
that have emotions, feelings, and memories that greatly impact learning.
(Erlaure, 2003) Merriam, Caffarella, and
Baumgartner (2007) states that the research that has been done on cognition has
not be reflective to adult learning. (Merriam, et.al., 2003, pg. 391)
Theoretical Topic – Brain-Compatible
Learning
While there are several theoretical
topics covered in MacKeracher (2004) and research, in this literature review I
will discuss brain-compatible learning and the main themes found throughout.
I selected this topic as it intrigues me, and I hope to learn more to be able
to understand this information into my professional field of adult
education.
Brain-Compatible Learning
So, what is brain-compatible
learning and why is this important to the field of education? Caine and Caine as cited in MacKeracher, 2004,
pg. 14) states that brain-based learning uses the brain’s rules for meaningful
learning and understands those rules for teaching. According to MacKeracher (2004) the brain
operates in a linear fashion and must make sense of things in a sequential order. The five fundamentals that MacKeracher (2004)
lists that the brain must function in a linear fashion and is at the same time
processing multiple activities includes: bodily functions, environment, emotions,
context, and activation of hemispheres. (MacKeracher,
2004, p.100) The brain is a well-tuned machine that is
responsible for all the functions taking place at one time. For example, an individual that is engaged in
learning will have memories that they bring with them into the classroom along
with other activities happening simultaneously such as the emotions or
environments that they are experiencing.
The mind is responsible for processing all this information and making
sense of it.
Caine and Caine (1990) present
twelve different principles that surround their thoughts on brain-based
learning. The following are the twelve
principles: the brain is parallel
processor, engages all of physiology, searches for meaning is innate, makes
meaning through patterns, emotions are a part of patterning, focused attention
and peripheral perception, simultaneously receives and perceives information,
learning is both conscious and unconscious, memory plays an integral role,
spatial memory, learning is challenged and inhibited, and each brain is
unique. (Caine and Cain, 1990, pg. 66-69) It is important for educators to understand
some of the theory behind brain-based learning and how it is unique to every
learner.
Adjunct Professor for the University
of California, Eric Jensen uses three words to define brain-based education
using ‘engagement, strategies, and principles.’ (Jensen, 2008) Through brain-compatible learning the educator
encompasses knowledge of how the brain functions from a basic neuroscience view
to develop a learning environment and teaching methods that best fit the
learner. Jensen (2008) provides his approach
to brain-based learning as ‘professionalism of knowing why one strategy is used
instead of another.’ (Jensen, 2008, pg. 410)
If the educator is aware of the key fundamentals and principles of how
the brain works and processes information, then there can be purposeful lessons
and classroom environments that encourage learning. (Jenson, 2008) This also relates back to the cerebral hemispheres
and the functionality of those spheres and how certain teaching methods might
help a learner.
Erlauer’s approach focuses on the
differences that learners possess in their ability to learn. As discussed previously, each learner brings
a unique cognition process and memories into the classroom. The
Brain-Compatible Classroom: Using What We Know About Learning to Improve
Teaching states ‘educators working in brain-compatible environments
can develop an unprecedented professional competence that will enable students
to reap the rewards of powerful, successful learning’ (Erlauer, 2003, pg. 2). Erlauer connects seven different elements to
brain-based learning: emotional wellness and safe environment,
body/movement/brain, content and student choices, time, brain enrichment,
assessment and feedback, and finally collaboration. (Erlauer, 2003, pg. 4-5)
While reading Erlauer’s approach it became apparent that the author wanted to
connect each specific element back to the classroom and the individual learner
to be able to best utilize the information that we already know to create
environments for learning to take place. Because of the plentiful
amount of research on how the brain works, educators are beginning to take
advantage of this knowledge to create lessons and environments in which
learning can take place.
According to Merriam, Caffarella,
and Baumgartner (2007) there is a lot of research on brain-based learning but
there are still unknown variables. Throughout
my literature review, I have found there are several scholars that support the
theories of brain-based learning, and others that say that there isn’t enough
evidence to change the field of education.
In Practice
As
mentioned earlier in this review, there are scholars that both agree with and
disagree with brain-compatible learning.
I believe as an educator it is important to understand the information
presented by scholars in the field and to use best professional judgement when
relating this back to our field of practice. Within my research it does appear
that most of the ideas and principles are based on children, and there is not a
lot of research on cognitive development in adulthood. However, in my research it appears that a lot
of the ideas in MacKeracher (2004), Erlauer (2003), Jensen (2008), and Merriam,
Caffarella, and Baumgartner (2007), a lot of the ideas and principles that surround
learning such as environment, context, emotions, and learning styles are all
reflective to the fact that each learner is unique in the way that they process
information. It will be important for me
as a practitioner to understand the basic principles of how the brain functions
so that I might be able to create an environment that is conducive to learning
and also be able to adapt myself to the environments. This information is helpful for adult educators
because the more we know about how we learn, the more we might be able to make
a connection meaningful learning.
Prior to my research on this topic,
I did not understand the complexity of the brain and mind connection in
learning and do not believe I will ever fully comprehend such a vast array of
information. However, knowing the information presented in this
literature will help me as an educator.
Reflection
When
beginning this literature review, I started by reading both MacKeracher (2004)
and Merriam, Caffarella, and Baumgartner (2007) to understand the basic concepts
of brain-based learning. I had to read
the Chapter 5 on Brain and Mind Learning twice to fully understand the
complexity of the brain and all the functionality. After reading these two textbook chapters, I then
proceeded to research brain-compatible learning through Ball State
Library. While there were several
articles, I was careful when selecting the scholars to find information that
would be helpful to me in the future. In
the beginning, it felt overwhelming with the amount of information to process
and contain within a couple of pages - there are several textbooks on these
topics and the research continues! I spent
a lot of time focusing on my outline, and then going back to my articles and
highlighting the points that I found important and highlighted the topic. It is important that there is more than a few
hours spent on this assignment. I can
honestly say that there was well more time spent in research and writing than
any other assignment in this course. It
allowed me to step out of my comfort zone and does make me feel vulnerable
posting this for the class to read. This
also goes back to the memories that I possess from earlier educational
experiences that make me feel more vulnerable to posting my paper.
Table 1. Brain-Compatible Learning
Main Ideas
|
Application in Practice
|
||
Idea 1
|
Learner cognition
is unique
|
Understanding that
each learner possesses memories and emotions that affect cognition
|
|
Idea 2
|
Educators can possess
basic knowledge of how brain functions
|
Understanding how
the brain functions allows a facilitator to develop educational environments
that beneficial to learning
|
|
Idea 3
|
The brain is
processing multiple activities that affects learning abilities
|
While presenting
lessons the learners could have multiple activities happening that do not
allow for all information to be processed.
Understanding this will be important for the educator.
|
|
Idea 4
|
12 principles
proposed by Caine and Caine
|
Understanding the brain
is a unique and complex organ and how information is received and processed
can help educators to develop meaningful lessons
|
|
References
Ackerman, S. (1992, January
1). Major Structures and Functions of the Brain. Retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK234157
Caine, R., & Caine,
G. (1990). Understanding a Brain-Based Approach to Learning and Teaching. Educational
Leadership., 48(2).
Elauer, L. (2003) The Brain-Compatible Classroom: Using What
We Know About Learning to Improve Teaching: Alexandria, Va. ASCD
Jensen, E. P. (2008). A Fresh Look
at Brain-Based Education. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(6), 408–417. doi:
10.1177/003172170808900605
Martin, E. (2017). A dictionary
of nursing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:
https://www-oxfordreference-om.proxy.bsu.edu/view/10.1093/acref/9780198788454.001.0001/acref-9780198788454-e-1518
MacKeracher, D. (2004). Making sense of adult learning (2nd
ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN-10: 080203778X ISBN-13:
978-0802037787
Merriam,
S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in Adulthood: a Comprehensive Guide(3rd
ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your review of the brain, and brain-based learning. I agree that much of the subjects covered in both our course text and other literature seems to support the notion that learning is ultimately very individual. It was interested to read your synopsis of brain structure, and what could be called "standards" that do not vary between most individuals. I would be curious to see how applying principles of brain-based learning might impact adult learners, because there seems to be some tension between brain development (essentially stops after a certain point) and lived experience. If more research is conducted on adults, I wonder how this would impact pedagogical applications of brain-based learning.
Will
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteThat was a great summary of brain based learning. I totally agree that educators need to be familiar with how the brain works to be more effective. I liked the comments you found on how every learner is unique and cognition is greatly effected by other things that are going on. This can be positive or negative.
The information you found from Crane and Crane based on their 12 principles for brain based learning was food for thought for me. My research topic is learning styles. While I think that learning styles are important some of the research I found shows that cognition styles (brain based style) are equally as important to implement for learning. While I am not going to list the 12 principles again, I am going to keep this in mind as I grow as a teacher.
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteThis was a very good summary on brain based learning. I totally agree that at first this was as well overwhelming! But as we, as many of our peers also saw, was that this theory review was very helpful in understanding our topics. I did find it interesting about your comment that most of the research is done for children, but how it can be such a good area of study for the adult learner. I think we can all find the value in gaining this knowledge as we try to apply these concepts into our work and possibly, our everyday life.
Jessica,
ReplyDeleteThis was a very well executed review of the brain and learning. One overarching theme that I have noticed within most of our topics is how individualized our approaches must be. Even still, understanding the basic concepts described are useful to any facilitator.
I also related to the process you described within your reflection, and appreciate the care you took to find information that was informative and relevant. Describing the vulnerability of posting our work is something I often feel as well.
Thank you!
Linda